Medical Services Professionals  
Join Our Network
Hardenbergh Group

Resources

Interested in receiving information about our webinars and thought leadership content?

Sign up for our emails here.

Show:
Show All
Papers
Shadow of Deceit – How the Crimes of Michael Swango Strengthened Healthcare Credentialing
Credentialing, MSPs, Peer Review
To understand why MSPs are referred to as the "Guardians of Patient Safety," read the unbelievable true story of serial-killer Michael Swango. Despite early warning signs, and repeated patterns of death, Swango managed to gain access to, and harm vulnerable patients. Read more about how healthcare credentialing evolved, and the passing of important legislation as a result of this case. and the crimes committed.
Q&A
Why a Critical Access Hospital Uses External Peer Review
Peer Review
We recently sat down with our client, a 25-bed critical access hospital and asked why they use external peer review and how review findings bring value to their medical staff. Read more about what they had to say.
Q&A
Troublesome Physicians and Providers – Your Questions Answered
Consulting, Peer Review, Physician Leadership
As a follow-up to our webinar, Brock Bordelon, MD, Medical Director at Hardenbergh, answers your questions about how to better identify, support and rehabilitate medical staff members struggling with troublesome behavior. Read more about how to effectively manage behavior that crosses the line.
Q&A
Are You Getting Value from Peer Review? 8 Key Questions to Ask Yourself
Peer Review
Does your current peer review program bring value to your organization and support provider success? OPPE, FPPE, ongoing evaluation of providers and peer review is very often developed and executed to meet accreditation requirements or respond to poor outcomes. When crafted in a meaningful way, professional practice evaluation can bring tremendous value to your organization, support provider success and elevate patient safety.
Case Studies
Has Your Hospital or Department Had an Unexpected, Tragic Outcome?
Peer Review
Do you have a devastated care team that is struggling to understand how and why this unexpected tragic outcome occurred? External Peer Review can help you to determine if opportunities for improved care exist – or whether there was a bad outcome despite excellent care.
Case Studies
Don’t Wait for a Neurointerventional Disaster
Peer Review
An early, proactive review can help hospitals avoid pitfalls that can plague new neurointerventional services.
Case Studies
Negligent Credentialing: Are You at Risk?
Peer Review
Failure to properly ensure physician current competency during the credentialing process can leave a hospital vulnerable to potential litigation.
Case Studies
OB Hospitalist Program: Clear Communication Channels are Critical
Peer Review
Make sure your OB Hospitalist program’s communication channels are clear, open, and optimized.
Case Studies
Surviving EMTALA Investigations: Ensuring and Proving Compliance
Peer Review
In the last few years, the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare (CMS) has increasingly set its sights on investigating Emergency Departments (EDs) for potential violations of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA).
Case Studies
Aging Physicians: Ensuring Clinical Competence
Peer Review
As concerns about patient safety grow, are your medical staff leaders struggling with the painful question of what to do with valued, even beloved physicians whose signs of decline can no longer be ignored?
Case Studies
Are Your Providers Struggling to Meet Current Performance Standards for Sepsis Management?
Peer Review
Strict adherence to sepsis guidelines results in dramatic improvements in morbidity and mortality. Despite intensive efforts to implement strict protocols and thoroughly educate providers, MDReview’s clients continue to experience problems in fully meeting standards of care.
Case Studies
Peer Review and Trending: More Powerful Together
Peer Review
As is the case with most things in life, balance and perspective are key. When it comes to identifying and addressing potential quality issues, external peer review provides the opportunity to closely examine the details of select cases, while tracking outcomes can shed broader light on problematic trends that warrant further study.
1 2